| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/11/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/11/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GIGLIOTI, R.; OLIVEIRA, H. N. de; SANTANA, C. H.; IBELLI, A. M. G.; NEO, T. A.; BILHASSI, T. B.; RABELO, M. D.; MACHADO, R. Z.; BRITO, L. G.; OLIVEIRA, M. C. de S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Rodrigo Giglioti, UNESP; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira, UNESP; Clarissa Helena Santana, UNESP; ADRIANA MERCIA GUARATINI IBELLI, CNPSA; Thalita Athiê Néo, UFSCAR; Talita Barban Bilhassi, UNESP; MARCIO DIAS RABELO, CPPSE; Rosângela Zacarias Machado, UNESP; LUCIANA GATTO BRITO, CPAF-Rondonia; MARCIA CRISTINA DE SENA OLIVEIRA, CPPSE. |
|
Título: |
Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina infection levels estimated by qPCR in Angus cattle from an endemic area of São Paulo state, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 7, n. 5, p. 657-662, jul. 2016. |
|
ISSN: |
1877-959X |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The levels of infection by Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina were estimated by absolute quantification through the quantitative PCR technique (qPCR). Fifty-one contemporaneous Angus cattle were evaluated on two occasions. The number of standard female Rhipicephalus microplus ticks present on the left side of the body was counted and blood samples were drawn from the tail vein into tubes containing the anticoagulant EDTA. The blood samples were submitted to DNA extraction and used to quantify the number of copies (NC) of DNA from B. bovis and B. bigemina by qPCR. The data on tick count and number of DNA copies were transformed for normalization and analyzed by a mixed model method. A multivariate model with repeated measures of the same animal, including the effects of collection, parasite species and their interaction, was used. The repeatability values were obtained from the matrix of (co)variances and were expressed for each species. The correlations between the counts of different species on the same animal, in the same collection or different collections, were also estimated. The results showed the qPCR could distinguish the two between infection by the two Babesia species. Infection levels by B. bovis and B. bigemina were detected in 100% and 98% of the animals, respectively. Significant differences were found (P<0.05) between the NC of the two Babesia species, B. bovis 1.49±0.07 vs. B. bigemina 0.82±0.06. Low repeatabilities were found for the counts of R. microplus and NC of B. bovis and B. bigemina: 0.05, 0.10 and 0.02, respectively. The correlations between R. microplus count and NC of B. bovis and B. bigemina were both very near zero. However, an association was observed between the NC of the two species, with a correlation coefficient of 0.30 for measures from the same collection. The absence of associations between the quantity of DNA from B. bovis and B. bigemina and the tick counts suggests that the variation of parasitemia by the hemoparasites did not depend on the tick infestation levels at the moment of each collection. The repeatability values estimated indicate that under the study conditions, the variations in the tick infestation levels and of parasitemia by B. bovis and B. bigemina depend more on factors related to each collection than on intrinsic factors of the animal. MenosThe levels of infection by Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina were estimated by absolute quantification through the quantitative PCR technique (qPCR). Fifty-one contemporaneous Angus cattle were evaluated on two occasions. The number of standard female Rhipicephalus microplus ticks present on the left side of the body was counted and blood samples were drawn from the tail vein into tubes containing the anticoagulant EDTA. The blood samples were submitted to DNA extraction and used to quantify the number of copies (NC) of DNA from B. bovis and B. bigemina by qPCR. The data on tick count and number of DNA copies were transformed for normalization and analyzed by a mixed model method. A multivariate model with repeated measures of the same animal, including the effects of collection, parasite species and their interaction, was used. The repeatability values were obtained from the matrix of (co)variances and were expressed for each species. The correlations between the counts of different species on the same animal, in the same collection or different collections, were also estimated. The results showed the qPCR could distinguish the two between infection by the two Babesia species. Infection levels by B. bovis and B. bigemina were detected in 100% and 98% of the animals, respectively. Significant differences were found (P<0.05) between the NC of the two Babesia species, B. bovis 1.49±0.07 vs. B. bigemina 0.82±0.06. Low repeatabilities were found for the counts of R. microplus a... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
QPCR; R microplus; Resistance. |
|
Thesagro: |
Babesia Bovis; Bovino. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
babesiosis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03252naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2057560
005 2018-11-07
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1877-959X
100 1 $aGIGLIOTI, R.
245 $aBabesia bovis and Babesia bigemina infection levels estimated by qPCR in Angus cattle from an endemic area of São Paulo state, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aThe levels of infection by Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina were estimated by absolute quantification through the quantitative PCR technique (qPCR). Fifty-one contemporaneous Angus cattle were evaluated on two occasions. The number of standard female Rhipicephalus microplus ticks present on the left side of the body was counted and blood samples were drawn from the tail vein into tubes containing the anticoagulant EDTA. The blood samples were submitted to DNA extraction and used to quantify the number of copies (NC) of DNA from B. bovis and B. bigemina by qPCR. The data on tick count and number of DNA copies were transformed for normalization and analyzed by a mixed model method. A multivariate model with repeated measures of the same animal, including the effects of collection, parasite species and their interaction, was used. The repeatability values were obtained from the matrix of (co)variances and were expressed for each species. The correlations between the counts of different species on the same animal, in the same collection or different collections, were also estimated. The results showed the qPCR could distinguish the two between infection by the two Babesia species. Infection levels by B. bovis and B. bigemina were detected in 100% and 98% of the animals, respectively. Significant differences were found (P<0.05) between the NC of the two Babesia species, B. bovis 1.49±0.07 vs. B. bigemina 0.82±0.06. Low repeatabilities were found for the counts of R. microplus and NC of B. bovis and B. bigemina: 0.05, 0.10 and 0.02, respectively. The correlations between R. microplus count and NC of B. bovis and B. bigemina were both very near zero. However, an association was observed between the NC of the two species, with a correlation coefficient of 0.30 for measures from the same collection. The absence of associations between the quantity of DNA from B. bovis and B. bigemina and the tick counts suggests that the variation of parasitemia by the hemoparasites did not depend on the tick infestation levels at the moment of each collection. The repeatability values estimated indicate that under the study conditions, the variations in the tick infestation levels and of parasitemia by B. bovis and B. bigemina depend more on factors related to each collection than on intrinsic factors of the animal.
650 $ababesiosis
650 $aBabesia Bovis
650 $aBovino
653 $aQPCR
653 $aR microplus
653 $aResistance
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, H. N. de
700 1 $aSANTANA, C. H.
700 1 $aIBELLI, A. M. G.
700 1 $aNEO, T. A.
700 1 $aBILHASSI, T. B.
700 1 $aRABELO, M. D.
700 1 $aMACHADO, R. Z.
700 1 $aBRITO, L. G.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. C. de S.
773 $tTicks and Tick-borne Diseases$gv. 7, n. 5, p. 657-662, jul. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/03/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
GEBLER, L.; SPADOTTO, C. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCIANO GEBLER, CNPUV; CLAUDIO APARECIDO SPADOTTO, CNPTIA. |
|
Título: |
Comportamento ambiental dos herbicidas. |
|
Edição: |
[2. ed.]. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: VARGAS, L.; ROMAN, E. S. (Ed.). Manual de manejo e controle de plantas daninhas. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2008. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 39-69. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
ISBN: |
978-85-89873-90-1 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Quando um herbicida é usado no agroecossistema, espera-se que apresente um tempo determinado de ação, após o qual deverá desaparecer rapidamente do ambiente. Quando isso não ocorre, como, por exemplo, quando o herbicida atinge parcialmente, ou mesmo não atinge, o alvo ou ainda não apresenta uma degradação tão rápida quanto a desejável, pode assim prejudicar outras plantas e outros componentes da biota do agrossistema. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Impacto. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Biodegradação; Herbicida; Impacto Ambiental; Meio Ambiente. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
W Química e Física |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/543570/1/10797.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01132naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1543570
005 2022-09-28
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-85-89873-90-1
100 1 $aGEBLER, L.
245 $aComportamento ambiental dos herbicidas.$h[electronic resource]
250 $a[2. ed.].
260 $c2008
300 $ap. 39-69.$cil.
520 $aQuando um herbicida é usado no agroecossistema, espera-se que apresente um tempo determinado de ação, após o qual deverá desaparecer rapidamente do ambiente. Quando isso não ocorre, como, por exemplo, quando o herbicida atinge parcialmente, ou mesmo não atinge, o alvo ou ainda não apresenta uma degradação tão rápida quanto a desejável, pode assim prejudicar outras plantas e outros componentes da biota do agrossistema.
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aBiodegradação
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aMeio Ambiente
653 $aImpacto
700 1 $aSPADOTTO, C. A.
773 $tIn: VARGAS, L.; ROMAN, E. S. (Ed.). Manual de manejo e controle de plantas daninhas. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2008.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
